A pal of mine here in LA - J.C. Gabel - has launched a new publishing imprint: Hat & Beard. All of the books they've done are beautiful looking objets fétiche and among them are several of special interest to music fiends. In particular, this new collection Slash: A Punk Magazine From Los Angeles, 1977-80.
Jointly edited by Gabel and Brian Roettinger, the book contains facsimiles of all 29 of the legendary punkzine's covers and reproduces many of the mag's features and articles, along with a shit ton of great photographs, flyers, concert posters, adverts, and so forth. There's also a bunch of new essays, memoiristic pieces and oral histories from folk associated with Slash or involved in the LA punk scene.
For sure, that can sometimes feel slightly incongruous set against the gnarly nature of the original magazine and the movement it documented. But face it, the aestheticization and archivization of punk, industrial, et al, is a done deal: that ship has long sailed. And it's not like these people weren't aesthetes all along - curation was latent within the deliberate and deliberated-over choices they made with graphics, clothing, indeed every aspect of presentation and performance, Not forgetting the provocations of the lyrics. This was a supremely stylized anti-style.
Whereas the music has often dated, or at least revealed its limitations, punk's graphic language, its hair and make-up, actually still retains a bit of its edge - an after-shock of the monstrous power to offend and alarm that it had in its own day (punks were literally seen as monsters, by the older generations and normals). In a sense, I think McLaren was right to argue that the clothes were more important than the records, more empowering and life-transforming. Certainly there was more of a commitment being made, a stand taken, when people got togged up like that and ran the gauntlet of the public gaze (and sometimes the public's fists), than simply buying the discs and listening to them at home. And the graphic language was shockingly new in its moment, much more of a break with the Old Wave way of doing things than the music was, which had plenty of precursors in '70s hard rock, glam 'n 'glitter, etc.
Los Angeles punk was a very Anglophile scene (unlike NYC) and in some ways seems to have pushed even further the U.K.'s shift of balance towards the visual side. Perhaps that explains why I get more of a frisson looking at the images or record cover imagery of The Weirdos or The Germs than listening to the noises they made. Never really understood the high regard for "Forming", for instance, while the Weirdos didn't get close to destroying music, just scuffing it slightly. The Screamers were great to look at, the music an enabler for the performances more than anything. They were right to hold out for the videodisc revolution that never came (or didn't come in time for them), rather than going into a recording studio to try to bottle what only worked in situ.
Information and purchasing details for Slash: A Punk Magazine From Los Angeles, 1977-80 can be found here.
